Odd how the US media is barely covering this story...

A&A said:
Oh, and you are using the internet compliments of the US Dept. of Defense. You're welcome. I am sure they appreciate your gratitude.

This is more-or-less true, give or take a department title or two. But for the user-friendly World Wide Web, which is how most people experience the internet today, you should thank a Brit who was working for a European-wide research consortium in France at the time.
 
elhombresinnombre said:
This is more-or-less true, give or take a department title or two. But for the user-friendly World Wide Web, which is how most people experience the internet today, you should thank a Brit who was working for a European research consortium in France at the time.

Wait,I thought Al Gore invented these internets.
 
Why they dropped paratroopers to fight crime

The soldiers came in the Boeing Globemaster III belong to a group of special forces that intervened in Grenada and Panama. U.S. commitment to militarize the war on crime.
20.02.2011


U.S. military involvement often seems to have little to do with government objectives for the region and encourages the American military to assume functions that would be illegal in the United States.

"The Pentagon's role in policy development (Latin America) is increasingly higher. Military activities have grown in participation, while the State Department and foreign aid budgets have fallen or stagnated. "

Neither of the two statements belong to a government official Argentine-prone as interpreted by the conservative press-to-imperialist excesses or overbearing. Both phrases highlighted in an article published in October 2005 ("Militarizing Latin America Policy, see box) by a renowned U.S. analyst, Adam Isaacson, MA in International Relations from Yale University and director of Programs for the Center for Latin America International Policy in Washington.

Following the thesis of Isaacson, the arrival of U.S. Boeing loaded Globmaster III "sensitive material" not necessarily enroll in a foreign policy in tune (and even less controlled) by the government of Obama, but rather in its absence, conveniently exploited by the disproportionate budgetary and operational capacity of the Pentagon and U.S. military complex. U.S. resources designed to "help" to the military and police forces in Latin America and the Caribbean increased from 225 million in 1996 to a peak of almost 900 million by 2009............

........................

• Weapons instead of ambassadors

Data collected by Adam Isaacson in his article "Militarizing Latin America Policy" are indicative of the imbalance in U.S. human resources devoted to foreign policy for our region and the associated policies.

"The Department of State, "reports the article, has about 16,000 employees in direct hire positions throughout the world, Latin America has a modest fraction of that total (around 4000). "

"Meanwhile, the Southern Command, the unit responsible for U.S. military activities in Latin America and the Caribbean, has a staff of 800 military and 325 civilian employees at its headquarters in Miami. "Two military sites in Puerto Rico and Honduras add 570 military and 1390 civilian staff.

The U.S. military presence in the region tends to exceed that of the civilian diplomats. Only through temporary deployments of forces, says Isaacson, in an average year more than 55,000 troops, including National Guard and reservists, go to visit Latin America.


Full story at the site of the South Perspectives

Read and learn.
 
*Odd how the Argentine Government (Foreign Minister) barely remembers this side of the story: Hector Timerman


"Only a 22-year-old student at the time, Héctor remained in Argentina as long as he could to work for his father’s release, until he was warned by the American ambassador that he should leave the country.
Héctor Timerman lived with Anabelle and their children in New York City from 1978 to 1989 during his exile from Argentina’s military dictatorship"

Know it is difficult to defend US actions in Latin America and not much to be proud of, but some of this BS is over the top. Think this event was contrived by Timerman and here we are: One big F....mess.

http://www.washdiplomat.com/June 2010/b2_06_10.html
 
Napoleon said:
Then you agree with most of the posters with regards to the current administration.

Nope, sorry but U.S are the worst liars by far. In terms of being caught lying, they most hold the world record. And people like you still believe them. Unbelievable really.
 
Yes the USA has spies & agents all over the world... most wealthy nations do. What does that have to do with cargo manifest...and the games the Argi government..was playing?
 
cbphoto said:
Yes the USA has spies & agents all over the world... most wealthy nations do. What does that have to do with cargo manifest...and the games the Argi government..was playing?

Because they first denied it, just like they are denying the cargo incident now. It's standard operation procedure for the U.S when they get caught red handed doing something. That doesn't mean that they are guilty though, but given their track record, it wouldn't surprise me if they are.
 
xibeca said:
Because they first denied it, just like they are denying the cargo incident now. It's standard operation procedure for the U.S when they get caught red handed doing something. That doesn't mean that they are guilty though, but given their track record, it wouldn't surprise me if they are.

Likewise, given their standard operating procedure it would not surprise me if Christina's government is blowing smoke to divert attention from her own actions.

Given this particular set of circumstances I would say the odds of the latter greatly outweigh the odds of the former.
 
There is of course, the Argentine air-force transport that was caught with 650kilos of cocaine in Spain last month...that just came out in the news. I am sure that has nothing to do with anything...
 
Back
Top