fifs2 said:
Bush won his second term in 2004 with 51%ish of the vote and noone, not even die-hard Republicans or history consider him much of a president to write home about. Sometimes the voters have no choice as in this 2011 election with such a fragmented and personality centic oppposition and as many of my Republican friends attested at the time they voted Bush back in for a second term to clean up the mess he started in his first term. Like Indec voting percentages show only 1 version of reality...
NOT a comparative example by far.....
Presidential ticket - Party - Ballot access - Votes
Bush/Cheney - Republican - 50+DC
50,456,002
Gore/Lieberman - Democratic - 50+DC
50,999,897
On top of, thanks to Florida Governor (Bush Jr. brother) who did the trick to push him into government.
Exit polling and declaration of vote winners
The Voter News Service's reputation was damaged by its treatment of Florida's presidential vote in 2000. Breaking its own guidelines, VNS called the state as a win for Gore 12 minutes before polls closed in the Florida panhandle. Although most of the state is in the Eastern Time Zone, counties in the Florida panhandle, located in the Central Time Zone, had not yet closed its polls. More seriously, inconsistent polling results caused the VNS to change its call twice, first from Gore to Bush, and then to "too close to call".
Also, charges of media bias were levied against the networks by Republicans. They claimed that the networks called states more quickly for Al Gore than for George W. Bush. Congress held hearings on this matter and the networks claimed to have no intentional bias in their election night reporting. However, a study of the calls made on election night 2000 indicated that states carried by Gore were called more quickly than states won by Bush; however, notable Bush states, like New Hampshire and Florida, were very close, and close Gore states like New Mexico were called late too.
Bush, did have behind all the media conglomerate support, which probably he or his family owns, not in Argentina the CFK case is totally the contrary, Bush have behind the support of the powerful US arms industry, Bush have behind the support of the business elite and USA oligarchy all part of the society in which he and his family were supporters of their interest.
What CKF do have instead? only the poor and low classes of this society, with the rest all against her, the monopolistic media, the dinosaur army, the upper oligarchy class, and in a nutshell the powerful minorities who operate and manipulate the strings of power in this country.
But even then they were defeated, against all that she pulled a healthy 54.11% of the total votes votes and in difference with US Bush/Gore the nearest rival in this elections was with only 16.9% of the popular vote.
How you can compare Bush with CFK it makes no sense at all.