antipodean
Registered
- Joined
- Oct 20, 2019
- Messages
- 2,123
- Likes
- 3,186
The top 2-4% that own multiple homes rarely complain about rental costs.Those locals who rent their 1br apartments in Yerevan to Russians for 3k USD per month seem to be doing OK and don't complain much. They still may not be "thankful", though.
Oh, for God’s sake. Long times for what treatment? Are you planning to give a birth any soon?
The system has worked the same way for ages. And people complained about it for ages. The fact that the system is still in place means that the positive effects outweigh the negatives.
And no plans on giving birth anytime soon, I was clear that these are comments being made by others on Argentine news sites. Read them for yourself - if these concerns are really true or not is secondary to it being a widespread and damaging perception.
Like anywhere in the world, immigration rules need to be constantly evolving and adapting to the world around them.
In Argentina, a meaningful review of migration policies has rarely been a priority for almost a century or more given bigger domestic issues going on which have, in parallel, also served to keep plenty of potential migrants away. The lack of review or change over time doesn't show that it works or that positives outweigh the negatives or that it is future-proof, just that it is neglected. For example, the current income requirement for a Rentista Visa is still only $30k - how exactly is a pensionado on $30k useful to Argentina or keeping with the original intent of this visa? (I'd go further and say that the current neglected state of migration policies is also detrimental to Argentina, as frankly speaking, it facilitates tax evasion for many migrants that are supposed to contribute to the country...)
The immediate issue here that risks becoming a big domestic issue that no government wants to face is explaining to voters that if due to their "negligence," their passport has become third rate because it caught the global spotlight for the wrong reasons, simply because there were too many loopholes with too few hurdles that too many "people of interest" caught on to.
As such a government here could consider making policies that most other developed countries (including those with Jus-soli) have such as:
- requiring a written or electronic DDJJ from all foreign arrivals to declare the purpose of their visit (e.g. working remotely or giving birth here as a "tourist" may not be crimes, but giving a false DDJJ is a crime and as such, criminals may face a harder or lengthier time getting residency or citizenship.)
- requiring visas for all nationalities with a high proportion of infractions/ overstays / false claims etc with a constant rolling review process
- clarifying and improving rules for travelers coming for medical purposes (including pregnant travelers) or perceived as medical risks to mitigate these risks (how can it be that Argentina asks Nigerian tourist visa applicants to submit a medical certificate stating that they don't have Ebola, before submitting their passport to an Argentine embassy for 1-3 months of processing but asks nothing about being pregnant?)
- requiring non-humanitarian migrants to have private medical insurance for the duration of their temporary residency and/ or pay for their treatment
- requiring non-humanitarian migrants to forego social assistance plans and certain subsidies for the duration of their temporary residency
- disqualify fraudulent or non-compliant migrants / tourists from obtaining residency or new entry permits for a period of time
- changing the administrative process to ensure proper vetting of all new citizens
- lengthening the administrative periods or requisites needed to obtain citizenship to make "express migration" less convenient
- a requirement for migrants to demonstrate compliance with local tax rules and payment of applicable taxes to obtain, change or renew residency status and/ or access state benefits such as public healthcare, social assistance or subsidies
Last edited: