jb5 said:The idea isn't to compare Argentina with Argentina. Compare it to it's once weaker neighbors, Brazil, Chile and Uruguay, who have blown past Argentina economically.
Thankfully, Argentina hasn't pursued economic policies that could only be described as "growth at any cost".
In spite of that, Argentina has a human development index (published by the UN Development Program) that is the fourth highest in the Americas (US, Canada and Chile take the top three, with Chile only just above Argentina. On an inequality adjusted basis, it's 5th, with Uruguay and Chile sitting very closely ahead.
Stopped by any of the less desirable places in Brazil lately? How has economic development worked out for the poor in Brazil?
On top of that, Argentina's GDP based on per capita purchasing power parity is the highest of any of its neighbours:
http://www.google.com/publicdata/ex...1477278000000&uniSize=0.035&iconSize=0.5&icfg
jb5 said:Some things just can't be disputed, Argentina is avoided like the plague by foreign investors because it is, factually, economically unstable.
Except that it hasn't. Foreign investment is at levels not seen in recent history in Argentina. Though obviously the government is likely to have a little trouble securing bond issues.
jb5 said:This does not mean there will be a major crash like 2002. But it does mean cuts in spending (entitlements) are inevitable as is the devaluation of the peso. How steep on both fronts will depend on commodity prices. We may see a 5:1 ratio at the end of 2012 or we may see a 6:1 before that. We can all just take our best guesses.
There doesn't seem to be many credible economists (baexpats members not withstanding) predicting an exchange rate of 6 pesos to the dollar by the end of 2012.
Here is the thing though, in an economy with a trade surplus, a weak currency is a very good thing for most purposes, assuming domestic inflation can ultimately be kept in check relative to the devaluation. Export taxes, whilst collected in pesos, are effectively valued in the same currency as the commodity (US dollars). This will ultimately give the government more of the domestic currency with which to fund their programs. The low level of foreign indebtedness means that the usual flip side of this, the increased expense of servicing external debt, is largely non existent.