John.St said:
The age of consent varies from country to country. Not counting islamic countries it is ranging from 13 to 18 (the latter is the age in that of the industrialised countries, which has the comparatively largest number of teenage pregnancies - oops!).
Claiming that your personal morale or the morale of your home country should be the standard of another country seems rather ridiculous.
Bajo_cero2 said:
Well, it is all about that. Nobody is going to impose you our moral values. And that´s because we respect yours but we demand you respect ours. This is what Argentina is like nowadays. That´s why LGTB marriage is legal in this country. Who are we to tell somebody whom should he or she love? Or just have an affaire?
Regards
Yes and no. I am not an ethical relativist so I think there is a wrong and a right which can be applied to human and social behavior. It is not always a matter of black and white - there are often a myriad shades of grey in any given situation/norm, but that doesn't mean one should not strive to do the right thing on a personal and social level.
For example, we often hear "when in Rome, do as the Romans." This may be okay for the cultural relativists, but unlike the golden rule, it is not a recipe for right and proper conduct (though it might be fitting in a survival guide). Romans threw Christians to the lions, a conduct to which I do not subscribe (and one can only wonder in amazement how depraved Roman citizens were to celebrate such conduct).
I do not want to throw Christians to the lions today even if I am in a place where it is done. I will vote against it if given a chance or demonstrate and protest such a practice. I may engage in civil disobedience or in even harsher methods if circumstances justify it. Even if I remain acquiescent, I do not "respect" such offensive mores that are not just or fair, that do not respect the humanity of all, even the less wealthy, the less successful, the less capable, the less male, the less white, and the less straight.
Accordingly, and contrary Bajo_cero2's jingoistic demands written above, it is not ridiculous to seek to implement change even if I am a foreigner. In fact, I do it although with respect to mores less significant and deep-rooted than the sexual dating patterns of Argentine 30 somethings and teenager girls. I do it when I take the time to sanely criticize an errant driver who refuses to give the pedestrian the lawful right of way, to people who inconsiderately smoke in crowded places, to debate with my Argentine friends who complacently acccept the political status quo as if it were inevitable. Small things, to be sure, but things that do contravene local customs and which reflect a lack of respect for local mores.
Don't get me wrong. I am not an ideal person. Far from it as my husband will attest. I just happen to think we all have a responsibility to act in an enlightend, ethical manner consistent with evolvng notions of civilized behavior. To me, the terms ethical relativism and cultural relativism are euphemistic synonyms for an anti-humanistic abandonment of sound ethics.